I'd like to follow up on votes on my CW posts as I do on normal ones, for cases like the voting on the new sites brainstorming, or just generic CW posts.
Joel is on board for having other SO sites for non-English launguages. Appears to be something they're researching with their VC partners. http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42373/what-sites-are-currently-missing-from-the-trilogy/42377#42377
I wrote a proposal for a dedicated golfing site, which in theory, if all the high-ranking users are real golfers, should eliminate that sort of problem.
…this is meta, it's aimed at an English speaking LTR audience and AFAIK there hasn't been a pro-active attempt to be otherwise. Also see Joel's comment on this answer: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42373/what-sites-are-currently-missing-from-the-trilogy/42377#42377 which reads to me as, "we're English speaking for now, fit in". If there was a specific localisation issue you had then fine, ask away on SO, but the content and the…
if you really do have resource constraints, how can you even entertain the thought adding more sites to the trilogy? http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42373/what-sites-are-currently-missing-from-the-trilogy Unless you already spending some of that VC?
Update: As per Ivo's comment (linking to Jeff's post) I'd propose explicitly mentioning in the faq that web-applications are out of the scope of Super User.
The solution to your problem lies here: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42373/what-sites-are-currently-missing-from-the-trilogy Not in cluttering Super User
Update: what luck, there is a discussion about this going on now. Dirk - Please have a look: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42373/what-sites-are-currently-missing-from-the-trilogy/42563#42563
Super User doesn't take questions about web sites and web services. Check out the FAQ - http://superuser.com, but there may be a site in the (near) future that does - http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/42373/what-sites-are-currently-missing-from-the-trilogy